EvalMath EN中文
Read the rules. Run the math yourself.
Futures prop firms

what it costs to get in,what it takes to break even

Nothing here is scored, ranked by opinion, or recommended. Rules are transcribed from the firms’ own pages, and metrics are derived with formulas you can recompute.

“Blank” and “None” aren’t the same. “Blank” means we haven’t transcribed it yet. “None” means the firm says there isn’t one.

To get in Expected cost to funding$134 – $444entry + (1/P − 1) × retry
To break even Profit required$134 – $471expected cost ÷ profit split

The odds barely differ. The price differs 3.3×.

At 25K the boundary conditions are close to identical across firms, so what separates them is not difficulty but what you pay.

To get in Expected cost to funding$171 – $766entry + (1/P − 1) × retry
To break even Profit required$171 – $958expected cost ÷ profit split

The odds barely differ. The price differs 4.5×.

At 50K the boundary conditions are close to identical across firms, so what separates them is not difficulty but what you pay.

To get in Expected cost to funding$344 – $1,702entry + (1/P − 1) × retry
To break even Profit required$344 – $1,891expected cost ÷ profit split

The odds barely differ. The price differs 4.9×.

At 100K the boundary conditions are close to identical across firms, so what separates them is not difficulty but what you pay.

To get in Expected cost to funding$426 – $2,374entry + (1/P − 1) × retry
To break even Profit required$426 – $2,638expected cost ÷ profit split

The odds barely differ. The price differs 5.6×.

At 150K the boundary conditions are close to identical across firms, so what separates them is not difficulty but what you pay.

7 firms, 26 evaluation accounts at 25K, ordered by each firm's cheapest one. Blue figures are derived here, not transcribed from any firm. The per-plan arithmetic and its limits are on The Math.

FirmPlansTo get inBought to paid1 2To break even3
Apex Trader Funding7$134 – $4447.4 – 19.1%$134 – $444
TradeDay3$163 – $2659.0 – 16.7%$326 – $391
Lucid Trading8$171 – $3089.8 – 20.0%$190 – $342
Topstep1$225——
TakeProfitTrader1$22613.5 – 18.4%$282
FundedNext Futures3$257 – $3268.2 – 20.0%$322 – $362
Tradeify Futures3$278 – $4247.4 – 19.1%$309 – $471

1Of 26 plans, 17 have an end-of-day trailing drawdown on at least one stage, so the figure is a range and both ends hold. The high end reaches 20.0%.

2Consistency rules are not modeled, so this reads optimistic. Where a firm has one, the real threshold sits above its published figure.

3Stated before the profit split, and before payout thresholds, minimum trading days and per-payout caps.

7 firms, 31 evaluation accounts at 50K, ordered by each firm's cheapest one. Blue figures are derived here, not transcribed from any firm. The per-plan arithmetic and its limits are on The Math.

FirmPlansTo get inBought to paid1 2To break even3
Apex Trader Funding7$171 – $5337.8 – 19.5%$171 – $533
TradeDay3$216 – $3879.0 – 16.7%$432 – $571
Lucid Trading8$313 – $5728.6 – 16.7%$347 – $635
FundedNext Futures4$317 – $7668.1 – 16.7%$334 – $958
Topstep5$347 – $4479.0 – 16.7%$385 – $430
TakeProfitTrader1$4079.0 – 12.3%$508
Tradeify Futures3$432 – $6437.8 – 19.5%$480 – $715

1Of 31 plans, 22 have an end-of-day trailing drawdown on at least one stage, so the figure is a range and both ends hold. The high end reaches 19.5%.

2Consistency rules are not modeled, so this reads optimistic. Where a firm has one, the real threshold sits above its published figure.

3Stated before the profit split, and before payout thresholds, minimum trading days and per-payout caps.

7 firms, 30 evaluation accounts at 100K, ordered by each firm's cheapest one. Blue figures are derived here, not transcribed from any firm. The per-plan arithmetic and its limits are on The Math.

FirmPlansTo get inBought to paid1 2To break even3
Apex Trader Funding7$344 – $1,1754.8 – 16.4%$344 – $1,175
TradeDay3$522 – $8976.8 – 12.5%$1,044 – $1,240
Topstep4$687 – $8106.8 – 12.5%$764 – $900
Lucid Trading8$693 – $1,2246.5 – 12.5%$770 – $1,360
FundedNext Futures4$761 – $1,5226.5 – 12.5%$801 – $1,691
TakeProfitTrader1$9486.8 – 9.2%$1,185
Tradeify Futures3$991 – $1,7024.8 – 18.2%$1,101 – $1,891

1Of 30 plans, 22 have an end-of-day trailing drawdown on at least one stage, so the figure is a range and both ends hold. The high end reaches 18.2%.

2Consistency rules are not modeled, so this reads optimistic. Where a firm has one, the real threshold sits above its published figure.

3Stated before the profit split, and before payout thresholds, minimum trading days and per-payout caps.

7 firms, 27 evaluation accounts at 150K, ordered by each firm's cheapest one. Blue figures are derived here, not transcribed from any firm. The per-plan arithmetic and its limits are on The Math.

FirmPlansTo get inBought to paid1 2To break even3
Apex Trader Funding7$426 – $2,3623.8 – 15.2%$426 – $2,362
TradeDay3$783 – $1,3596.8 – 12.5%$1,566 – $1,740
Lucid Trading8$996 – $1,6326.6 – 12.5%$1,107 – $1,813
Topstep4$1,082 – $1,2456.8 – 12.5%$1,202 – $1,383
TakeProfitTrader1$1,0996.8 – 9.2%$1,374
FundedNext Futures1$1,3596.8 – 12.5%$1,431
Tradeify Futures3$1,563 – $2,3744.8 – 17.7%$1,736 – $2,638

1Of 27 plans, 19 have an end-of-day trailing drawdown on at least one stage, so the figure is a range and both ends hold. The high end reaches 17.7%.

2Consistency rules are not modeled, so this reads optimistic. Where a firm has one, the real threshold sits above its published figure.

3Stated before the profit split, and before payout thresholds, minimum trading days and per-payout caps.

Derived

The Math

What the rules imply. Every metric is a published formula you can recompute and argue with.

Transcribed

The Rules

What the rules actually say, field by field, including where a firm’s own pages contradict each other.